Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3193

Re: Relationship for Time Confirmation

$
0
0

Matthew,

  • Yours is a complex requirement for a user-exit. ABAPers (if you are not one) need to do some research and experimentation with few available exits or BAdis.
  • BAdi like WORKORDER_CONFIRM, WORKORDER_UPDATE  could be of use..
  • If we use CONFPM05and write a code to confirm op 0011 (using fm status_change_intern) while saving op 0010, it might throw an error that the Order is locked by the sy-uname. But first you should try this.
  • Please have a look at exits CONF0001, CONFPM01, CONFPM02, CONFPM03, CONFPM04also because while deriving your solution the ABAPer might need few of them.
  • The research if has t continue beyond user-exits and BAdis, then Implicit enhancement PointsinprogramSAPLCORU also should be explored.
  • Queries which do not have simple technical solutions could only be assisted by receiving information about relevant Enhancements.

 

 

Good luck

KJogeswaraRao


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3193

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>